Wednesday 24 February 2010

Thriller Film Audience Questionaire






Thriller Audience Research Questionnaires

1) What are your expectations/ratings of an independent, low-budget film? (Famous Examples being Pulp Fiction, One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, Se7en, Monty Python and The Holy Grail, Lock Stock)

Plot

1 2 3 4 5 (1 = Worst 5 = Best)

Settings

1 2 3 4 5

Lighting

1 2 3 4 5

Camera Shots/Angles

1 2 3 4 5

Special Effects/CGI

1 2 3 4 5

Editing

1 2 3 4 5


2) What are your expectations/ratings of a mainstream, high-budget film? (Avatar, Harry Potter, Star Wars, Die Hard, James Bond)

Plot

1 2 3 4 5 (1 = Worst 5 = Best)

Settings

1 2 3 4 5

Lighting

1 2 3 4 5

Camera Shots/Angles

1 2 3 4 5

Special Effects/CGI

1 2 3 4 5

Editing

1 2 3 4 5


3) How effective are these key settings of thriller in building up expectations and stimulating you as you would expect?

Woodland


1 2 3 4 5








Desolate Buildings


1 2 3 4 5




Dark Alleyway


1 2 3 4 5

4) How effective are these key scenes of independent and mainstream thriller films in building up expectations and stimulating you as you would expect?


Pulp Fiction (Independent Film)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6csp2fZt2E

1 2 3 4 5


Se7en (Independent Film)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJhTi-f7DEI

1 2 3 4 5


Reservoir Dogs (Independent Film)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLTqecGbdCc

1 2 3 4 5


The Godfather (Mainstream Film)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_RcT9qCCFo

1 2 3 4 5


The Godfather 2 (Mainstream Film)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUnDisz8z0

1 2 3 4 5


The Dark Knight (Mainstream Film)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQHfoz9Be7U

1 2 3 4 5



Overall, do you prefer an independent or mainstream film?

………………………………………………………………………

Thank-you for your help.

Tuesday 23 February 2010

Thriller Storyboards




Shot List

Shot One- A girl Running through ally - Mid tracking shot.Not much light, eerie feel to the shot.

**Credits One** Diagetic sound of Girl Running

Shot Two- girl going through the hole in the fence. - Close up from Front. Various Extreme close ups of Arms and hands, Legs and Feet and Face.

**Credits two** Diagetic sound of Fence.

Shot Six- Girl Running to the civ. - Tracking Mid shot from behind with some More ECU.

Shot Seven- Girl cowering in the corner of the sqaush court - panning shot from front.Close ups of her hands and legs.

**Credit Three** Diagetic sound of crying and Footsteps.

Shot eight- Feet appearing at the doorway, cigarette dropping to the floor and foot stamping it out. ECU on cigarette.

Shot nine- first person view of girl looking up at men, the lighting hides their faces .

Shot Ten- first person view of girl running away, grabbed by man one and hit with the weapon by man two.

Shot Eleven- Blood hits wall.Shot Twelve- Shot from Floor in opposite corner of room, girl slides down the wall and close up of feet as they exit the room.

Moving Image Production Has Always Been Lead By The Audience’s Demand For New Sensation

Ever since an 1878 experiment in the United States used an astonishing 24 cameras to produce the motion of a galloping horse, humanity has been captivated time and time again by the powerful art form of film and cinema; its hard to picture this massive achievement as a stride forwards in technology and art when considering the “awe-inspiring” effects and sensation films like Star Wars, Avatar and Lord of the Rings have produced.

But are these budget-smashing films worth the hype? Has humanity pushed forward technology and effects so far that these images of far distant universes and horrifyingly real, brutal battles have become our frank and merciless expectations? Have we become so ignorant that an immersive, original plotline must be backed up by six or, in some cases, seven digit budgets? If so, what hope is there for cinema?

Only a brief glance at the highest grossing films of all time lists confirms my fears; Titanic: $1,848,813,795, Avatar: $1,637,262,209, both these grosses together could surely do great help in the world if it was given to charity rather than spent watching these to films; my viewing of Titanic was satisfactory at best whilst films like The Godfather, with a budget lesser than $194,500,000 and blood that looks more like blackcurrant squash is one of my favourite films. Ranked second place in IMDb.com’s ‘Top 250’, The Godfather is still regarded as one of the best moving pictures to be produced 37 years on whilst Titanic isn’t featured. The fact that within twenty years a film budget can be raised by almost 200 million is shocking – surely pushed by the audiences demand for new sensation.

Another factor is, of course, the “extraordinary” film pushing the boundaries for all future films, Avatar. Being put on hold for over twenty years is was at first planned to be released in 1999, due to technical aspirations; was it worth the wait? Website Rotten Tomatoes described it as “more impressive on a technical level than as a piece of storytelling” Whilst Kenneth Turan of the L.A Times stated that the film had "flat dialogue" and "obvious characterization". To me it is extraordinary that a film with these labels has become, since I started this discussion, the highest grossing film of all time, it seems very clear that this was achieved down to technical sensation and marketing- with costing rumored to be over £500,000,000.

A major contrast with this is the reception of the release of famous film The Shawshank Redemption, with a budget of just $25,000,000 and gaining a measly $3,341,469 in profit. Though famously disregarded when released in cinemas, it is one of the most highly rented movies still today and regarded as one of the best films ever made, top of IDMB’s database with a rating of 9.1 with just under half a million votes compared to Avatar’s 8.5 with a mere 195,613 votes. It emphasizes the public’s apathy towards films without technical advancements, despite The Shawshank Redemption’s seven academy award nominations.

I believe that with our striving towards technical advancements has pushed us as an audience to disregard anything other than the best cinema has to offer, independent films such as London to Brighton that tackles important issues such as pedophilia, drugs and violence are not reaching our mainstream audience which I believe is disdainful. High grossing films such as Star Wars, Titanic and Lord of The Rings may teach the importance of love, friendship and morality but these topics have reached audiences time and time again whilst much more local, dangerous and, more important messages are failing. It is my view this needs to change if our ethics, alongside our viewing pleasure, are to be modernized; art, media and film is rapidly becoming one of our populations outlets for our views and ethic and if we do not bring it up to date and eliminate any ignorance to view these then what hope is there for the viewing public?